We are all aware of the conflict within Catholicism over the well publicized accounts of failures of priests to live up to their vows, the resulting legal cases, and the efforts of the hierarchy to address these challenges.  Father Richard John Neuhaus, editor of the journal First Things, examines the inner debate over what has been done to address these issues here

The recent instruction from the Congregation for Catholic Education is not, strictly speaking, doctrinal. It is a directive based upon moral doctrine and might best be described as a prudential judgment made by “legitimate ecclesiastical superiors” and to be followed by all under their authority. Further, while it is issued by the authority of the pope, it does not, unlike Humanae Vitae, carry the more solemn weight of an encyclical. That having been said, it requires a measure of exegetical agility to interpret some of the criticisms of the instruction as anything less than a rejection of the Church’s constantly held doctrine regarding human sexuality, and homosexuality in particular. The teaching is that homosexual desires are objectively disordered and homosexual acts are intrinsically immoral. This is joined to a call to respect and extend pastoral care to those who are burdened by same-sex desire, helping them to respond, along with sinners of every kind, to the “universal call to holiness.”

If you read the whole thing it is clear that Catholicism faces every bit as contentious a debate about these matters as some branches of Protestantism.